SAG Awards Preview

E: Don’t forget that the SAG awards air tonight!  Oh, I know, they’re up against lots of other great things like The Good Wife and Downton Abbey (why must you torture me so, network executives?) but still, it’s a fun show, including folks from both movies and television, and since it’s all about the actors, it’s all celebrities and all glam.  And if you care about the Oscars, it’s possible we could learn a lot about this very puzzling year, far more so than at the Golden Globes (which only predicted the Oscar winner twice in the last decade).

First, we’ll see if Daniel Day-Lewis and Anne Hathaway are really the locks we think they are.  If they win their respective categories of lead actor and supporting actress, it’s incredibly unlikely that they’ll be upset.

Actor in a supporting role, on the other hand, is still so unsettled that a win here won’t lock down anything.  All the nominees in this category have at least one Oscar and one SAG award to their name already.  Globe winner Christoph Waltz wasn’t nominated here (Skyfall‘s Javier Bardem was instead) so he can’t reapeat; could SAG support go to Broadcast Critics winner Philip Seymour Hoffman, or to Tommy Lee Jones – who many see as delivering the most important performance, or to Alan Arkin (or his movie, Argo)  – or to Robert DeNiro, who’s finally found a role with some depth?  And how much will it mean, whoever they pick?  A vote for Bardem would have the least relevance.

Where SAG can really show us something, however, is in Actress in a Leading Role.  Most consider the race to be between the two Golden Globe winners, It Girls Jennifer Lawrence and Jessica Chastain.  Is this making anyone else think of the Cate Blanchett/Gwyneth Paltrow showdown in 1999?  Paltrow won the SAG on her road to beating her dramatic (and perhaps more critically acclaimed) rival for Oscar.  Most pundits give the edge to Lawrence, but could Oscar’s slight of Zero Dark Thirty director Bigelow give Chastain the edge? Will Harvey Weinstein’s involvement in Silver Linings Playbook help or hurt Jennifer Lawrence?  Does he still have the campaign clout that helped put Paltrow on the podium?

And here’s the other big category where it can make a difference is, of course, the best picture race. SAG rewards Best Ensemble, which isn’t quite the same thing as Best Picture.  That designation might help the Silver Linings Playbook to a win – but on the other hand, Argo and Lincoln also boast large, well nominated casts.  Earlier on Lincoln looked like a perfect awards movie, but it hasn’t gathered the support expected.  The Academy’s well publicized snub of Ben Affleck may be galvanizing the voting bodies to reward Argo almost out of spite for the Academy’s directing branch.  Who’s willing to – to quote the movie – tell the Academy to Argo-F*** themselves?  The Producer’s Guild has just done it, naming Argo their best picture of the year. And body composed solely of actors might enjoy that quite a lot.

In any case, there’s going to be a lot to learn and enjoy in this telecast, which begins at 8pn Eastern time on TNT and TBS.  And, no doubt, a lot of speeches reflecting on those director snubs if anyone from Argo or Zero Dark Thirty wins.  I’ll be back tomorrow morning to discuss the ups and downs, and what it all means for Oscar.


7 comments on “SAG Awards Preview

  1. Pam says:

    Must give you sh-t for this line:
    or to Robert DeNiro, who’s finally found a role with some depth?
    I didn’t see SLP yet, but, E, come on, he’s had tons of roles with depth… Raging Bull, Taxi Driver, Godfather 2, Deer Hunter, Goodfellas, Bronx Tale, Cape Fear… his filmography reads like the AFI’s top 100 and mostly because he was in those movies. he’s known for nuanced roles…just because he’s playing a dad in a non-violent, moody movie, doesn’t mean he’s just discovered depth. And that’s just a handful of the movies I’ve seen, I haven’t seen all his movies by far. I didn’t like Casino so you can pick on that movie if you want. But Robert De Niro plays complex characters with layers of depth. Too glib, my friend!

    • E says:

      That’s the point, though, Pamster baby, although I obviously didn’t express it well. Care Fear was 20 years ago. What’s he done of real value since? Analyze This? Meet the Fockers?

      • M says:

        Let’s see, since Cape Fear that was either great or had depth…. A Bronx Tale, Casino, Heat, Sleepers, Cop Land, Ronin, Meet The Parents (the first one) and Stardust, to name a few.

        • E says:

          I think if you’re a fan of DeNiro’s early work, his recent stuff hasn’t been very impressive. Granted he’s funny in Meet the Parents and Stardust and Analyze This, but I’m not sure it’s the same.

        • P says:

          Yeah what M said. Even if the movie’s not great, de Niro’s usually great in it and has depth. As for my Casino line, not my favorite movie but you got to like him as the Midwestern Jew in the early days of Vegas Mob with psychopath best friend — even if movie not as great as 50 other movies he’s done. You’re allowed to make the qualifier (you didn’t originally!) but it’s a tough sell when the guy’s great at comedy (less depth but he’s made other movies in the last twenty years) and drama and has such a list of great roles and characters to his credit.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s