So You Think You Can Dance: Season 14, The Academy part 1

E: Hello out there!  If you’ve been here before you know that I am thrilled through my entire being that this show has returned, and returned to something resembling it’s old format.  Adult dancers for the win!  I guess we’ll see how the All Star format works out (I can already tell that, even with a reduced, coastally-focused 2 city audition schedule, the cuts will still be brutal) but I will take it over nothing any day.  It’s all about the dance!  If nothing else happens this season, I could watch “Brand New” – the spectacular, 100 dancer flash mob that began this episode in true La La Land style – every day for the rest of the summer and that would be enough.

But I’m so glad we’re going to get more.

And, um, I know it’s lame of me to start so late in the season.  Things have been a mite crazy for the last few months here in Sibling World.   Much more than a mite, if I’m being honest.  But the craziness is settling down (fingers crossed) and I really miss writing, so I’m going to try and get back to a more settled schedule.  I did take notes on the audition episodes, in hopes of having the time to blog them; not only did I not have the time then, but I can’t find all my notes now, so I won’t have as encyclopedic a recall of the contestants as usual.  Please excuse me if I forget names!  I will do my best to give you all my oodles of joy in seeing this show return. I hope someone out there is glad I’m back, too. Ready to break this down?

Continue reading

Please Alert the Aladdin Casting Backlash: Representation is When Geography Matters

C: Growing up as Arab Americans, the Quibbling Siblings got used to characters purportedly of our heritage played on the small and large screens by just about anyone vaguely “dark looking,” whether the actor was white, Latinx, or whatever. Notably, for the better part of a decade, this was The Face Of The Middle East to many Americans:

sayid

For those of us regularly munching kibbe and fatayer at the Lebanese picnic, however, it was really really obvious that that’s an Indian guy.

Cue the great Aladdin debacle of 2017. The filmmakers of the live action remake (because the nostalgia machine cannot be stopped) have come out and said they can’t seem to find an actor “of Middle-Eastern or Indian descent” who could play the role, despite searching for several days in London! So the internet — specifically a subset of the internet that’s passionately vocal about fairness — has pounced on them, deservedly. People who believe that Representation Matters are calling out the absurdity of the implication that such an actor could not be found. But oddly, most are not calling out the “or Indian” part of the casting call. Instead they themselves are pointing to many excellent actors from India, rather than considering the fact that we have no established Arab American or Arab British lead actors as the real problem here.

Thus, as food for thought for anyone who wants to express annoyance about this in a savvy, representation-conscious way, here’s a summary of the Three Big Problems with this well-intentioned uproar.

1. India is not in the Middle East

I know you know this. And most articles I’ve seen do acknowledge this, in a “teach the controversy” kind of way. Like, “Some people point out that Indian and Middle Eastern people are different, but wouldn’t Dev Patel make an awesome Aladdin? Also, Bollywood!”

Okay, but they are actually different. Different language groups, different cultures, different in typical appearance, quite often different in religion (though both have Muslim & Christian populations). Same goes for the other some-kind-of-Asian men being suggested (like the Filipino model whose picture I saw posted with a caption claiming him to be identical to Aladdin). The principle behind these posts is that these groups tend to have brown hair & eyes and tanner skin, and are underrepresented on film because they’re not pasty-white guys. Trouble is, you might as well be suggesting Latino actors to play Aladdin.

You know that would be messed up. I know you know it. But it’s time to apply that logic to the current situation.

2. Agrabah is definitely the Middle East

There have been several posts talking about how it’s unclear where Disney’s Aladdin is set, which is kind of true – I couldn’t pinpoint a modern country here. But it’s obviously set in a stereotypical cartoon fantasy Arabia. That’s why people who don’t like negative Arabic stereotypes got annoyed about the line: “Where they cut off your ear/ If they don’t like your face/ It’s barbaric, but hey, it’s home.” That song is called “Arabian Nights,” by the way.

agrabah

Yes, the original story has a complex ancestry, but does that actually matter given that this is a remake of the Disney film, not a reinterpretation of the old tale? If you saw the live-action Beauty and the Beast, you know they might get momentarily confused about where the movie is set (as when a Frenchman by the name of Gaston remarks that he doesn’t know what “je ne sais quoi” means), but they are dead serious about being nostalgically, painstakingly faithful to the ’90s films. So yeah, this Aladdin is Arabic.

3. Men of Middle Eastern descent rarely get work in Hollywood

Truly: even Terrorist #3 may be a Russian actor. Women fare a little better, especially if they have a mixed heritage (like Salma Hayek and Catherine Keener), but for male actors of Arabic descent who have played actual leads you get Tony Shalhoub (of Monk, notably a cable TV show not a movie), and… um, is that it? Surely I’m missing someone. Apparently Vince Vaughn is a quarter Lebanese, if that counts for anything.

And is that because there are no Middle Eastern lead parts? HECK NO. How about Gods of Egypt or Exodus: Gods and Kings or Prince of Persia, just to start with the current decade? All of those, as you know, starred exclusively Euro-descended white guys, a longstanding tradition.

“Come on though, isn’t it better to cast someone who at least isn’t white? Isn’t that a victory?” Sure. Absolutely. I would love to see more Indian leads, more Filipino leads — heck, more Latino leads in Hollywood movies. And yes, if I had to choose between Dev Patel and Jake Gyllenhaal for this role I would 100% pick Dev Patel. If those were the only options.

But let’s keep our eye on the ball here. Disney came right out and said they’re having trouble finding an actor to play Aladdin. By suggesting they cast all these non-Arabic actors, you are proving their point. We need a lead actor of Middle Eastern descent working in Hollywood yesterday, but since there’s a shortage on time machines, let’s advocate for one to get his first major film role now.

 

Oh yeah… what about Jasmine in all of this? According to the Hollywood Reporter, it’s down to two actresses: one Indian, and one British of half-Indian, half-European descent.

Colossal & Unforgettably Gifted in Style: April 2017 Movie Preview

C: April’s underway, but if you’re anything like us, you probably haven’t been to the movies yet this month. Perhaps you have a vacation coming up though, so it’s time to start thinking about what to see!

E: Well, today’s the first official Friday of April, so unless you were seeing March movies, you won’t have needed this preview.  Now, this isn’t the explosion into summer we get in May, but still, this April brings us a veritable bouquet of interesting spring movies.  As befits the season, I have hope that some of these films are very much worthwhile.

M: Again this month we’re running on a tough timetable, so we have fewer of the limited-release movies than we normally include. Apologies! Now to it.

Continue reading

Tale As Old As Time: March 2017 Movie Preview

E: More and more, March is becoming a hot movie month.

M: And March 2017 is becoming a month of increasingly insane schedules for at least two of the three Quibbling Siblings. Our apologies, but this will be a late, bare bones preview.

C: A preview-slash-review, if you will. What’s come out already in March, and what’s still to come? Some pretty intriguing stuff!

Continue reading

So That Was Unexpected: Oscar Reactions 2017

E: Um, okay.

Sorry to take so long in my response, but it’s been crazy at work and at home.  Family birthdays, school orientations, religious holidays, huge work events.  You’d laugh if I told you the thing I’ve done this week.  (All wholesome, but a little nutty.)

In general, that Oscar cast was funny and enjoyable.  Jimmy Kimmel was largely terrific.  His monologue was hilarious (Meryl Streep! discrimination!)  I could have done without the mean tweets, and the tour bus gag went on a little long, but it was hilarious.  The music and the opening sizzled.  Most of the categories went the way I thought they would.  I loved the montages of previous winners before all the acting awards, and was heartened/amused to see how fiercely the editors emphasized Oscar winners of color.  I think each montage started that way.  There were a few exciting wins, a few good speeches (emotional, political but not off-puttingly political), some great clothes, great music, a charming host, Hunger Games-like parashutes.  And then there was the weird, wild finish.

No, it was weird enough to keep me up for another few hours Sunday night, baking (because what else do you do when the world goes crazy?).  After a little time to dissect it all, I’d like to run down my thoughts – what I got wrong, what I got right, and why.   Why is the most interesting question of all.

Because seriously. If you made this stuff up, no one would believe you.  But with the rest of the world going crazy, why should the Oscars be any different?

Continue reading